ART & the Ends of Consensus
The History of Art and Architecture's 2026-2027 lecture series invites art and architectural scholars to share their unique perspectives on the challenges of collectivity and shared interpretation.
Art and architecture have a troubled but persistent relationship with collectivity and consensus. Propaganda mandates that everyone receive the same message. Performance and participatory art always, and often self-consciously, produces the very collectivity that it purports to reflect. Architecture has been variably celebrated and criticized for structuring social behavior through the organization of space and time. Ritual arts collectivize bodies by choreographing appropriate modes of interaction. And religious works of art and architecture work to instill collective understandings of divinity.
The raises important challenges. First, it makes clear how some of the reasons art and architecture are celebrated (bringing people together, communicating information) are the same reasons for which it is condemned (controlling, directing, indoctrinating). It then also directs us to think critically about the ways that art and architecture have historically been understood to instigate social and epistemological change. These intersecting challenges–among art and interpretation, interpretation and social life–become even more urgent in moments of the breakdown of consensus and shared social reality. Join us to think critically about collectivity and consensus, the promises and problems of a shared interpretation of art, and by extension the world.

About Dr. Larne Abse Gogarty 
About David Sadighian